Liverpool’s transfer activity this summer has sparked curiosity and concern among fans, especially with less than three weeks remaining in the window. While some supporters may be puzzled by the lack of high-profile signings, a closer look at the nuances behind Liverpool’s approach reveals a more strategic, long-term vision.
In early June, Liverpool expressed interest in Lille’s Leny Yoro, an 18-year-old defender with immense potential. However, Yoro’s preference for Real Madrid made the Reds a secondary option. Despite Lille’s eagerness to sell, Liverpool and Real Madrid eventually walked away, leaving Manchester United to strike a £52 million deal. For Liverpool, making Yoro—who would have been a fifth-choice center-back—one of the most expensive signings in their history didn’t align with their careful planning.
Similarly, the proposed move for Newcastle United’s Anthony Gordon was more about Newcastle’s financial constraints than Liverpool’s pressing need for the player. While Liverpool admired Gordon, a swap deal involving Joe Gomez and an additional £30 million was not seen as a significant loss, especially after Newcastle resolved their financial issues through other player sales.
These moves, or the lack thereof, aren’t failures but rather examples of the “opportunistic” approach that sporting director Richard Hughes emphasized. Liverpool is clearly focused on strategic opportunities rather than rushing into deals that may not offer long-term value.
The attempted signing of Martin Zubimendi from Real Sociedad also showcased Liverpool’s thoughtful approach. Despite initial optimism, Zubimendi chose to stay with his boyhood club, much like Steven Gerrard did in 2005 when Chelsea came calling. Such decisions reflect the emotional ties players have with their clubs, and Liverpool respects that.
With just a few weeks left in the transfer window, some fans are anxious about the lack of reinforcements. However, under new manager Arne Slot, Liverpool has shown promising pre-season form, which suggests that panic is unnecessary. Yet, the club is aware of the risks posed by injuries, and further signings are likely, especially with captain Virgil van Dijk publicly urging the club to strengthen the squad.
Liverpool’s approach also seems to be influenced by the contract situations of key players like Trent Alexander-Arnold, Van Dijk, and Mohamed Salah, all of whom are in the final year of their contracts. The club appears to be taking a cautious, long-term view, possibly saving resources for future negotiations or replacements.
One example of this forward-thinking strategy is Liverpool’s interest in Valencia’s Giorgi Mamardashvili. With Alisson Becker potentially moving to Saudi Arabia in the future, Liverpool is exploring options to secure a long-term successor in Mamardashvili, possibly through a loan deal to Bournemouth before eventually integrating him as Alisson’s replacement.
Under the new leadership of Hughes, Slot, and Michael Edwards in his role as Fenway Sports Group’s ‘CEO of football,’ Liverpool’s transfer strategy is more unpredictable than ever. The lack of significant updates on incoming players this window might reflect a club that is carefully planning for the future, rather than reacting hastily to immediate pressures.
In summary, Liverpool’s measured approach to this summer’s transfer window suggests that the club is preparing for potential changes on the horizon, with a focus on long-term stability and success.
